The Dominican Republic’s Public Ministry has formally responded to 21 procedural motions filed by the defense of former Attorney General Jean Alain Rodríguez, seeking to delay or dismiss evidence in his ongoing corruption trial. The prosecution, led by Mirna Ortiz, argued that the defense failed to prove irregularities and requested that these incidents be ruled on jointly with the final verdict to prevent further obstruction of the judicial process .
Rodríguez and his legal team are attempting to exclude key evidence, including a Chamber of Accounts audit report, claiming it was submitted outside statutory deadlines and lacks validity. Additionally, they seek the return of seized assets, such as properties in Casa de Campo and vehicles, arguing these were acquired legally before his tenure or are family homes requiring significant maintenance funds .
The Second Collegiate Tribunal, presided over by Judge Yissel Soto, recessed the hearing to deliberate on these motions. A decision is expected on November 2. This procedural battle precedes the substantive debate on the merits of the case, which involves accusations of administrative corruption, bribery, embezzlement, and money laundering involving over RD$6 billion between 2016 and 2020 .
Key points include:
While the defense argues for exclusion of evidence based on technical violations, the prosecution maintains these tactics are designed to stall justice. The outcome of the November 2 ruling will determine whether the trial can advance to examining the alleged financial crimes.
