A Colombian judge has ordered the preservation of over 30 artworks removed from Bogotá’s Museo Nacional, halting further government interventions while a legal battle over historical memory unfolds. The controversy stems from President Abelardo de la Espriella’s directive to dismantle exhibits he labeled part of a "cultural counter-revolution," targeting items related to the 2016 Peace Agreement, LGBTQ+ rights, and political figures like Bernardo Jaramillo Ossa.
The Ministry of Culture, led by Minister Paola Holguín, defended the withdrawals as necessary to prevent the museum from becoming a space for "apology of crime" or revictimization . However, critics argue the move constitutes state censorship. The Museo de Antioquia publicly supported the removed pieces, stating, "The works are not alone... their questions are too" . Meanwhile, artist Carlos Castro highlighted an inconsistency in the policy, noting that his work featuring Pablo Escobar remains on display .
On October 19, Juzgado 24 de Familia admitted a tutela (constitutional protection action) filed by opposition figures and cultural collectives. The court ordered the immediate conservation of the withdrawn artifacts, prohibiting their destruction or alteration, and barred new content-based removals without administrative justification . This ruling forces the Ministry to explain its criteria within 24 hours.
The decision has unified disparate opposition sectors, including the Pacto Histórico and conservative figures like former President Juan Manuel Santos, who warned that history cannot be erased . Senator Wally threatened a national strike, accusing the government of imposing a "dictatorial" narrative . In Congress, Interior Minister Rodrigo Lara acknowledged Jaramillo Ossa was a "great man" after being confronted by Representative José Luis Bohórquez, though he declined to address the broader policy . The government maintains it will continue reviewing museum curricula to reflect "national values" rather than specific ideological groups .
