China has categorically rejected recent accusations by US President Donald Trump that Beijing interfered in the 2020 US elections, calling them "pure inventions" and "malicious slander." The exchange risks straining the fragile detente between the two superpowers, which had seen recent high-level visits.
In a televised address, Trump alleged that China stole 220 million voter records from 18 US states, calling it "the largest electoral data leak in history." He claimed the data included names, addresses, phone numbers, and political preferences, and urged new voting restrictions Source: abc.es. Trump also suggested Venezuela could manipulate US voting machines Source: emol.cl. These allegations mirror his long-standing, unproven claims of fraud in the 2020 election, which he lost to Joe Biden Source: excelsiormx.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian dismissed the charges as baseless. "These are pure fabrications and malicious slander that have long been proven to be unfounded," he said Source: infobae.com. Lin reiterated that China has "no interest in US elections" and has never interfered Source: excelsiormx. He called on Washington to "reflect on its own actions" and stop using China as a campaign issue Source: emol.cl. Notably, he added that the international community knows "who habitually interferes in other countries' internal affairs" Source: abc.es.
“« ... Las afirmaciones realizadas por la parte estadounidense son puras invenciones y difamaciones maliciosas que desde hace tiempo han quedado demostradas como acusaciones infundadas»”
“China no tiene ningún interés en las elecciones estadounidenses y nunca ha interferido en ellas”
“Un completo invento y una difamación maliciosa sobre la que se demostró hace años que no se sustenta en base alguna”
The backlash comes as a Pew Research Center study shows China's global image has surpassed that of the US for the first time Source: abc.es, adding a fresh dimension to the bilateral friction.
“Son puras invenciones y calumnias maliciosas que desde hace mucho tiempo se ha demostrado que carecen de fundamento”