A Brown University professor's experiment has provided striking evidence of AI-driven cheating in a take-home exam. The average score dropped from 96% on the midterm to 48% on an in-person final. Source: tomshardware, thenextweb
Professor Roberto Serrano offered a take-home midterm after a campus shooting made students anxious. The class size ballooned from 30 to 86. The midterm average was 96%, with 40 perfect scores—far above the historical average of 65-80%. Source: tomshardware Serrano suspected AI when answers had a "very convoluted style" and matched ChatGPT outputs. Source: tomshardware
Serrano announced the final would be in-person and that he would compare results. If they matched, the midterm would count; if not, it would be voided. The response was telling:
Serrano estimates at least 50 students cheated. Brown is reviewing cases individually. "We cannot afford to have a society in which a significant fraction of our best young minds think that cheating is OK," he said. Source: tomshardware The incident highlights challenges universities face as AI reshapes academic integrity.
“Historically the average grade in the midterm of this course has ranged between 65 and 80 [percent], and this exam was harder than the exams I wrote in the past, because … take-home is an opportunity to challenge the class a little bit more, given that you’re giving the students unlimited time.”
“We cannot afford to have a society in which a significant fraction of our best young minds think that cheating is OK.”
“The class averaged 96, and 40 students scored a perfect 100.”
“Take the AI away, and half the apparent knowledge goes with it.”